My work keeps me in constant contact with Civil Engineers. respect of which a few.
Among other things, something I hate so much! is when they speak of "planning." we really believe, which is patching streets and concrete cast on others. WTF!
just urbanism is linked to these issues. this is a real plantificación, design, re-election, study society in the future viewing, order, history, artistic expression, health, function, etc, etc.
and these bastards, (I hope one reads this) think they are planning to give the width of some streets and draw some plots.
want to live in a dream where alguuun day. someone will open their eyes and stop destroying cities.
leave something here that I found on the web:
is a very old discipline, which incorporates concepts from multiple disciplines and area of \u200b\u200bpractice and study very large and complex. According to some, it is a science that would fit within the social sciences ( geography, sociology , etc.) And, as others, would be a art, traditionally associated with the architecture is , a set of practical knowledge that provide the foundations for solving the problems of cities, this duality is seen in the descriptive and explanatory science of planning as compared to the prescriptive nature of planning as art, although both approaches necessarily mutual feedback.
Care CIVS Ings. You! DO NOT PLANNING. (Mostly) so we are as we are ...
thanks.
0 comments:
Post a Comment