I visited my own blog, since I had left: (.
whom I have read through this blog, know that from time to time I have presented some concepts related to art, giving an explanation more or less with my own opinion and a little research ...
but! I have never expressed the concept of art as it is .... For here is stupid in my way of thinking.
"Art is the expression of man (human or not to say I'm sexist (but more regularly by the man haha)) through or across a technique."
that's what I always say when I'm asked ... easy without many detours.
but I like to break it down a bit different.
because the expression? good for expressing ideas, feelings, visions of an artist.
've always thought that the most important is the feeling, which is what is transmitted by the senses, but not directly.
is valid in two ways: One is that the recipient feels the same way that the artist wanted to express or ..... that each one can interpret or otherwise repercurta.
things not worth, is that the artist is to the side of his work, saying what he meant, that makes me personally very low category ... it is not, nor should it be a direct communication.
however, went through a technique.
by that I mean not only the use of, for example, of a painting, sculpture, etc (media ).... expression every technique or means of expression is broken down into "subtenicnicas" in the painting are, watercolor, oil, acrylic, mixed ink, pencil, pastels, etc etc. also known as materials.
well as in music, the architecture, literature ....
as well, we have that the artist is to express one of the arts such as painting, and already large to use pastels or acrylic?
not, to master a technology is necessary to use also the method that word so important to the method, see the method as the "whip" that makes mastering the technique, without the proper use of methods and mechanisms is not true that we master a technique.
an artist who calls himself an artist, should (in my opinion) master the true method, technique and medium of expression.
this in the beginning, because there are always those born artist whose knowledge about technique and method, can do without them, thanks to his talent.
which will replace the above. but most are born without the talent, which is why we need to develop methodologically. if you become a worthless self-proclaimed artist.
There are also artists who were not born this way and are not as methodological .. through their experience.
well this is the concept of art, isolating all the others and some that I need, but if I add more ... differs by me too ....
now I hope my previous posts and this know how to say no when it is not, and if when is yes.
ciao!
whom I have read through this blog, know that from time to time I have presented some concepts related to art, giving an explanation more or less with my own opinion and a little research ...
but! I have never expressed the concept of art as it is .... For here is stupid in my way of thinking.
"Art is the expression of man (human or not to say I'm sexist (but more regularly by the man haha)) through or across a technique."
that's what I always say when I'm asked ... easy without many detours.
but I like to break it down a bit different.
because the expression? good for expressing ideas, feelings, visions of an artist.
've always thought that the most important is the feeling, which is what is transmitted by the senses, but not directly.
is valid in two ways: One is that the recipient feels the same way that the artist wanted to express or ..... that each one can interpret or otherwise repercurta.
things not worth, is that the artist is to the side of his work, saying what he meant, that makes me personally very low category ... it is not, nor should it be a direct communication.
however, went through a technique.
by that I mean not only the use of, for example, of a painting, sculpture, etc (media ).... expression every technique or means of expression is broken down into "subtenicnicas" in the painting are, watercolor, oil, acrylic, mixed ink, pencil, pastels, etc etc. also known as materials.
well as in music, the architecture, literature ....
as well, we have that the artist is to express one of the arts such as painting, and already large to use pastels or acrylic?
not, to master a technology is necessary to use also the method that word so important to the method, see the method as the "whip" that makes mastering the technique, without the proper use of methods and mechanisms is not true that we master a technique.
an artist who calls himself an artist, should (in my opinion) master the true method, technique and medium of expression.
this in the beginning, because there are always those born artist whose knowledge about technique and method, can do without them, thanks to his talent.
which will replace the above. but most are born without the talent, which is why we need to develop methodologically. if you become a worthless self-proclaimed artist.
There are also artists who were not born this way and are not as methodological .. through their experience.
well this is the concept of art, isolating all the others and some that I need, but if I add more ... differs by me too ....
now I hope my previous posts and this know how to say no when it is not, and if when is yes.
ciao!
